Tuggar’s Political Desperation: A Failed Minister’s Attack on Bala Mohammed

alphamedia24
0

Tuggar’s Political Desperation: A Failed Minister’s Attack on Bala Mohammed

By, Abdulwahab Muhammad Bauchi. 

The recent outburst by Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, against Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed reveals more about the minister’s desperation than any genuine concern for governance. Tuggar’s response to Bala Mohammed’s valid criticism of the tax reform policy reeks of political opportunism, an attempt to remain relevant in a state where his influence has all but vanished. Rather than addressing the glaring failures of his tenure in foreign affairs, Tuggar has resorted to baseless attacks, further exposing his disconnect from both national and state realities.

Tuggar’s Political Disconnect and Absenteeism

Yusuf Tuggar, a native of Bauchi State, has spent more time globetrotting than engaging with the realities of his home state. If he had taken the time to assess the transformational policies of Governor Bala Mohammed, he would have seen the massive strides in agriculture, infrastructure, and economic empowerment that have turned Bauchi into a model of progress.

Under Bala Mohammed’s leadership:

  • Agriculture has been revolutionized, with initiatives like the Kaura Economic Empowerment Programme (KEEP) and the Tiamin Rice Project, which have empowered thousands of farmers, youths, and agribusiness entrepreneurs.
  • Rural and urban infrastructure has been revitalized, earning Bala Mohammed national accolades, including the “Rural Road Infrastructure Governor of the Year 2022” and the “Urban Renewal Governor of the Year 2024.”
  • State economy has improved, despite inflation and federal economic challenges, through prudent resource management and innovative policies.

Tuggar’s failure to acknowledge these achievements is a clear sign of either ignorance or political mischief.

A Foreign Minister with No Achievements

While Bala Mohammed has transformed Bauchi, Tuggar has presided over one of the most disastrous tenures in Nigeria’s foreign policy history. His stewardship has been marked by diplomatic blunders, regional instability, and policy missteps that have weakened Nigeria’s standing on the international stage.

1. ECOWAS Leadership Collapse

Under Tuggar, ECOWAS—once a united regional bloc—is now in crisis. His poor diplomatic advice to President Tinubu has led to the withdrawal of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, a failure unprecedented in Nigeria’s history.

2. Breakdown of Relations with Sahelian Neighbors

Nigeria’s once-strong ties with its northern neighbors have deteriorated, leading to increased border insecurity and the collapse of anti-terrorism efforts. The once-effective Joint Multinational Anti-Terrorism Taskforce is now defunct, further exposing Nigeria’s borders to threats.

3. Diplomatic Failures and Humiliation

  • The UAE visa ban debacle, which saw Nigeria being humiliated on the international stage, remains unresolved.
  • Nigeria’s diplomatic influence has waned, with key African allies distancing themselves due to Tuggar’s lack of strategic engagement.

4. Alignment with Neocolonial Interests

Tuggar’s foreign policy stance has abandoned Nigeria’s historically Afrocentric diplomacy, instead aligning with French neocolonial interests in Africa. This has alienated regional allies and positioned Nigeria as a pawn in foreign geopolitical games.

Tuggar’s Hypocrisy on Bauchi’s Development

One of Tuggar’s most laughable attacks on Bala Mohammed is his criticism of land use policies in Bauchi, particularly the Tiamin Rice Project. This project, far from being “land grabbing,” has been a game-changer for agricultural development, creating thousands of jobs and boosting food security. Tuggar’s inability to recognize the importance of large-scale agricultural investment exposes his ignorance of modern economic policies.

Furthermore, his insinuation that Bauchi is benefiting from increased federal allocations ignores the national economic strain caused by inflation, rising wage demands, and poor federal economic policies. While other states struggle, Bala Mohammed has managed resources prudently, ensuring sustained development despite economic turbulence.

A Stark Leadership Contrast

The difference between Bala Mohammed and Yusuf Tuggar could not be more striking:

  • Bala Mohammed has an impressive track record in public service, from his time as an FCT Minister, Senator, and now Governor, where he has delivered concrete results. His Land Swap Programme as FCT Minister alone saved the government over ₦1.3 trillion, accelerating housing development.
  • Yusuf Tuggar, on the other hand, has no tangible achievements to his name as Foreign Affairs Minister. Even President Tinubu frequently sidelines him on key diplomatic trips, signaling his irrelevance in Nigeria’s foreign affairs strategy.

Tuggar’s 2027 Political Ambition and Desperation

Tuggar’s attacks on Bala Mohammed are not about governance—they are about 2027. Having failed to make an impact in foreign affairs, he is desperately eyeing the Bauchi governorship, hoping to unseat a governor whose performance has been widely praised.

However, this strategy will fail. The people of Bauchi have seen the concrete results of Bala Mohammed’s leadership and will not be deceived by an absentee politician who only remembers his home state when election season approaches.

Conclusion: Tuggar Must Remove the Log from His Eye

Instead of attacking Bala Mohammed, Yusuf Tuggar should focus on cleaning up the mess in Nigeria’s foreign affairs. His failure to manage Nigeria’s diplomatic interests, his inept handling of regional crises, and his disastrous foreign policy record make him one of the most ineffective Foreign Ministers in recent history.

Tuggar’s criticisms of Bala Mohammed are baseless, politically motivated, and ultimately self-defeating. The governor’s commitment to economic growth, infrastructure development, and agricultural transformation speaks for itself. If Tuggar truly cared about Bauchi State, he would support progress instead of engaging in petty political attacks.

Before pointing fingers, Tuggar must remove the log from his own eye and take responsibility for his failures—both as a minister and as a politician with fading relevance.

Post a Comment

0Comments
Post a Comment (0)
To Top